Yup, I tried to prioritize performance and lines of code. But you are right, this solution would not be suitable for work environments.

Yo, this looks clever, but it's very difficult to understand to a third party or yourself at a future date. I'd prioritize readability more.

Why did you remove whitespaces?

yep you are right, I just added the floor for understanding, didn't mean it to be added in actual code.

is it really important to add floor()? as i is an integer, would it not just run the same amount of loops?

this code doesn't account for primary numbers, can be quickly corrected by checking for ns smaller than 0 and returning false as no negative numbers are prime, a.s - given an integer -n for n as any positive integer -n is always divisible by n which is a divisor other than one and itself

Run the loop only till i < n/2 instead of n (strictly speaking should be only till square root of n but this works too) . That way, in case the number is prime, your loop will only run half as many times (again, this could be improved further by running it floor(sqrt(n)) many times). Just making it more efficient.