Damn! Makes sense! Thanks!

return breaks the flow of execution so the else block is extraneous in this case. if the number is even, execution will stop after number * 8. otherwise it will continue to run until it hits the next return statement

So we don't need to use Else? I thought this way would return both *8 and *9 for even numbers.

This kata is a subject to deduplication process here: https://github.com/codewars/content-issues/issues/119.
Please join the discussion to help us identify duplicate kata and retire them.

This doesn't happen in the tests, so I guess we don't have to support that.

I think you made the smartest solution here lol

Mmmmm trunc or floor

Added by volie

Reraised as issue ~~ (Still not fixed after 4 years is a shame thooo T_T

Your code will return after seeing just the first item, every time.

['stone', 'stone', 'Gold', 'stone', 'stone']
hahahaha

Ruby 3.0 should be enabled.

Beautiful.