He's making a train

Nesting ternary. No thanks.

Cool Kata, but i think the level is for minimum 7 kyu ;) :)

Why do the vowels have to be in [ ]?

Maybe change the function nameto follow best practise, like equal_sum?.

Whaaaaaat? :)
Here in the description is described "Fix the bug in Filtering method", but not write complet another code! :)

Hi, why I have this error on the test?

     assertEquals(expected, GeometryBasics.trianglePerimeter(t), 0.000001);
                                                             ^

Note: Some messages have been simplified; recompile with -Xdiags:verbose to get full output

Hi, I don't understand, why the Random test not passed? :/

List of gold: 629, 480, 749, 424, 629, 702, 692, 552, 309

A: [629, 749, 629, 692, 309] = 3008

B: [480, 424, 702, 552] = 2158

arrays first differed at element [0]; expected:<2787> but was:<3008>

What is the problem? Or must some more description for this task to write.

Thanks!

As the Safe Navigation Operator, & deals with the possibility of nil when calling the method on the object – maybe consider &. together here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36812647/what-does-ampersand-dot-mean-in-ruby

what does the & do?

The assertions in Java are backwards, which leads to some confusing failure messages. They're correct in the sample tests, but flipped in the rest.

Awesome kata!

Hi neilm,

I have one question, I don't understand why in this example is 577?

subStr: FklhOIvYefXaBJAMRxVKFklhOIvYefXaBJAMRxVK
str: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

expected:<660> but was:<577>

Thanks!

yes, marking it as having spoiler content

Hi! Thank you!

• We have a vocabulary with 1 or 2 characters? - No, the minimum length of a word is 3.
• Or the vocabulary is too long? - No, the edge tests are not too long:

describe("New Edge", function() {
    let a = [
       "fye*** w*eg **e ***z* ***s x*e*fg *****v eee*eu i** ***re **g*t* *e*", 
      ["eggete","fefffv","eeeeeu","fyefee","wfeg","iee","eefs","hee","hfe","efere","gegzf","xgeffg"]
      ];
    it(`given ${JSON.stringify(a[0])}, ${JSON.stringify(a[1])}`, function() {
    assert.strictEqual(isValid(translate(a[0], a[1])), "fyefee wfeg hfe gegzf eefs xgeffg fefffv eeeeeu iee efere eggete hee")
   });
})

Post your solution here, if you want (marking it as having spoiler content) and we can try to find the error