Loading collection data...
Collections are a way for you to organize kata so that you can create your own training routines. Every collection you create is public and automatically sharable with other warriors. After you have added a few kata to a collection you and others can train on the kata contained within the collection.
Get started now by creating a new collection.
I've had similar bugs IRL. It's good to be aware of such issues, nice kata.
Rejected...
Should address this issue in the description instead of simply replacing the Ruby / Crystal / Java specific function with Python's.
Also, the new author solution is arguably inferior because it can now incorrectly match characters that are not between the ASCII digits
0
to9
. Consider that:Done
The idea of the kata was to illustrate using a dictionary to improve efficiency of search. Without that, I'm not sure it's very interesting.
I have no control over the rating. It was set by the reviewers in the beta phase. My understanding is that it cannot be changed now.
100k data sets for a 7kyu kata is overkill. That's why raiting falling pretty bad.
I suggest limiting the amount to 1k and do not bother with efficiency (because that would put the kata in 6kyu category).
As a reminder:
https://docs.codewars.com/curation/references/kata-ranks#7-kyu
The kata description could be more Python-oriented for sure, but the instructions themselves are fairly clear and straightforward. Additionally, there's already another issue addressing this, making a second issue seems redundant.
IMHO current constraints makes it 6kyu.
At 7kyu brute-force solutions should be accepted.
much more torough tests have been added to C#. tons of solutions did not make it ;-)
added in Java
I like the idea of this Kata, but you can get away with just half of the solution because tests don't cover all of the edge cases.
I can't believe nlogn solutions get so many best practice votes... 🫠
Fixed.
C# starter code contains:
Which causes an error:
"#" in C-Sharp marks the beginning of a preprocessor directive.
"//" should be used instead for one line commenting.
Yeah, you're right. It's placed in a such way, you need to read every word in the description a few times in order parce the requirement.
But it is mentioned.
Loading more items...