Go translation

True, changed that & also made test headers more useful.

Oops 🤦‍
Added self_init call and random non-palindromes.

It isn't best practice, but because they are passing the literal 0.0. Instead, 0 would work just as well. (Go literals are untyped.)

Re: The Go translation

The function's return type should have been [][2]string, to match other languages.

OCaml translation

Added random tests

Added random test

Same thing here, just ported the JS tests and there weren't random ones.
But if it's ok to add additional tests to a translation, I will.

Good point, added a call

I ported this from JavaScript, which has no random tests.
Is it ok to add additional tests to a translation?

Agreed. Also, in Go a return type of (int, int) would be more idiomatic than [2]int (although more cumbersome to test)

Go translation

Go translation

Go translation