By the same reasoning, all Python solutions should get a comment saying that 'Good solution but requires Python. Would be a problem if writing for embedded devices'. This shows that this comment about C++11 is completely irrelevant.
Not trying to say you're wrong, but I believe this is what siebenschlaefer is trying to say.
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
Thank you so much for your quick reply. I really appreciate it.
Hi! that's a lambda expression. You can read more about it here: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/lambda or https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/cpp/lambda-expressions-in-cpp?view=msvc-160
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
what the hell
I think this solution is harder to read than an inline if
You so cool, thanks!: )
By the same reasoning, all Python solutions should get a comment saying that 'Good solution but requires Python. Would be a problem if writing for embedded devices'. This shows that this comment about C++11 is completely irrelevant.
Not trying to say you're wrong, but I believe this is what siebenschlaefer is trying to say.
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
Wow, never met accumulate before! )
Btw, is it as fast as a straightforward solution?