Not a kata suggestion

@Chrono79 thanks, for some reason my translation was not updating.

Edited it myself to make error messages clear in fixed tests and the random number generation to have bigger numbers (they were all below 103).

@Chrono79 : not my fault, the stupid server is not working, I updated the translation some time ago. Retrying

The same problem with cr_assert_eq that the other kata.

@Chrono79 how is it still giving away the solution ?

@Chrono79 noted, working on it.

You can read the WikiPedia page.

Good luck

You never return -9. Read the definition of digital root.

May I suggest that you do some easier Kata's first and the when you are ready come here ?

As for adding exceptions or changing description, that is not my area, for that you will need to talk to author (which is impossible since he deleted his account). I only created the C++ and C translations and not the Kata itself.

I Authored the C++ translation and I can assure you there are no mistakes in it.

But anyway rechecking with other versions :

• first test case should be 0
• second should be 0
• third should be 0

So yes, it is a mistake on your part and not mine :)

hint :Read the description again