Ok, guys! I will update this kata in a few days ;)

Oh, also, Ruby version needs random tests.

Lots of cheese I already noticed:

• select is blocked but not reject, and many, many other things
• Enumerable::sort is not blocked
• method blocking is after user code, so
• You also didn't block running bash command either, so it's trivial to just run rb/python ourselves

i.e https://www.codewars.com/kata/reviews/588a55734b9a4bd09a000d1d/groups/5adeeedd60da5c6f5a00006f

See, it looks like it's not me who's not skilled, but rather the opposite ;-)

Honestly, I'd align on Voile's opinion: python and ruby are just BAD at forbidding features. So I'd make go away the restrictions and left the kata be easy in both languages. Other than that will just create a lot of hassle to implement/maintain for almost nothing.

Nah, we all know blocking sorting methods in Python is impossible, because we already have many rounds of battles trying to block sorting functions on other katas in the past. The defender always loses.

Well, not unless you use JS. Blocking sorting function in JS is easy. You see, it's not a thing about "skill", people are skillful, it's just that sometimes you can't do what you want to do in your language if your language just can't do that ;-)

Hey, I'm not familiar with the Python. But you can grow up your skills and help to fix Python translation :) P.S.: Voile, write your own 'good' language, what's wrong dude?

Do you think it's that easy to block sort methods in Ruby? ;-)

Don't forget that Ruby is just as bad as Python!

python version is absolutely inconsistent with the description: Note: You must do this in-place without making a copy of the array Except that:

• sorting mehtods are absolutely not blocked
• it's IMPOSSIBLE to actually check that the user does the thing "in place", since the inputs aren't passed as a whole array, but with varargs.

=> with bestwebua's last changes, the two versions are actually two different katas. That's bad...

I have blocked all default sort methods in Ruby)

If in place sorting is required, I would suggest blocking answers that use "sorted".
Makes the answers much more interesting imo.

Same. Mine says (0,0) expected but my code is returning the correct values. Are the random test wrong or am I wrong?

@FArekkusu ...

• Thanks . . Many thanks Alex For your Feedback
• I Really Appreciate your tremendous efforts and patience ..
• and if not personal or vulgar , and for more katas ideation and thoughts exchange privately , could you leave me your skype profile .. thanks in advance Bro .. regards .. Zizou

Leaving one link instead of a whole list is good, but I don't really understand why would you convert the whole text to italics. Personally, I use it for comments, minor emphasis, and highlighting words as figurative speech, but stress important text with backticks, bold text and UPPER CASE, leaving everything else normal.

@FArekkusu

• I've done the mentioned above (in My previous Comment) , Just Some Touches
• So pleeeeeeeeease take a look , and i'm Tuned for any Suggestions Bro , awaiting for your feedback .. Regards .. Zizou