The test cases for C++ should be more extensive. They don't cover many cases which will only show up for the randomized tests. Otherwise, great Kata!

Lua translation !

C++ fork with some minor improvements:

• Initial solution changed according to C++ authoring guidelines
• Function signature is no longer enforced (required for backwards compatibility)
• Moved the reference solution out of the global scope
• Some minor code formatting adjustments

Please, review and approve/reject

C:

• the input matrices should be const-qualified
• unhelpful assertion messages

fixed here

RISC-V Translation

For the inclusiveness and self-awareness (and professionalism), this kata should specify that the phone number format being used is the North American Numbering Plan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Numbering_Plan

Description should be language-agnostic

JS:

• chai assertions should be used
• initial code should be a class
• no random tests

fork

It should be more clear that the interval [x, y] includes x, but not y. If you think of the problem in terms of sets, the set of the interval [x, y] = {x, x + 1, x + 2, ... , y - 2, y - 1}. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

I feel like the overlap vs adjacent numbers should be explained better. It took me a minute to realize something like (1,4) and (5,7) doesn't become (1,7). I know it's small but it's still a little annoying not having it explicitly spelled out.

RISC-V Translation

i wrote the function and it works but it doesn't return the right answer in large random numbers i used someone else answer in another site and still the same problem it works with normal numbers but when it gets big numbers it doesn't work is it my problem or this one is broken too ?

Python:

random tests do no guarantee to generate all radii being < 5