• Sign Up
    Time to claim your honor
  • Training
  • Practice
    Complete challenging Kata to earn honor and ranks. Re-train to hone technique
  • Freestyle Sparring
    Take turns remixing and refactoring others code through Kumite
  • Community
  • Leaderboards
    Achieve honor and move up the global leaderboards
  • Chat
    Join our Discord server and chat with your fellow code warriors
  • Discussions
    View our Github Discussions board to discuss general Codewars topics
  • About
  • Docs
    Learn about all of the different aspects of Codewars
  • Blog
    Read the latest news from Codewars and the community
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
xai Avatar
Name:Unknown
Clan:Unknown
Member Since:Mar 2019
Last Seen:Mar 2025
Profiles:
    Following:10
    Followers:0
    Allies:0
    View Profile Badges
    • Stats
    • Kata
    • Collections
    • Kumite
    • Social
    • Discourse
    • Conversations (8)
    • Replies
    • Authored
    • Needs Resolution
    • Custom User Avatar
      • xai
      • commented on "Yoneda lemma" kata
      • 6 years ago

      nice kata

      — andrei-bolkonsky

    • Custom User Avatar
      • xai
      • commented on "Recurrence relations" kata
      • 6 years ago

      Thank you.

    • Custom User Avatar
      • Ivana
      • commented on "Recurrence relations" kata
      • 6 years ago

      Not, of course. Collatz problem is a good counter-example.

    • Custom User Avatar
      • xai
      • commented on "Recurrence relations" kata
      • 6 years ago

      can we take for granted from (Ord a) that the right part of the function only calls on smaller values?

    • Custom User Avatar
      • xai
      • commented on "Scott Encoding" kata
      • 6 years ago

      just some easy Yoneda stuff, and nothing complicated.
      winking

    • Custom User Avatar
      • xai
      • commented on "Recover a secret string from random triplets" haskell solution
      • 6 years ago

      oops forgot to delete redundant importations

    • Custom User Avatar
      • xai
      • commented on "Merged String Checker" kata
      • 6 years ago

      "The restriction is that the characters in part1 and part2 are in the same order as in s."

      Guess there's some ambiguity here. I didn't realize this was given. Instead I thought I had to check it also.

    • Custom User Avatar
      • xai
      • commented on "Merged String Checker" haskell solution
      • 6 years ago

      pretty smart how the last line takes care of all cases with one of them being [].
      took me several lines

    • © 2025 Codewars
    • About
    • API
    • Blog
    • Privacy
    • Terms
    • Code of Conduct
    • Contact

    Confirm

    • Cancel
    • Confirm

    Collect: undefined

    Loading collection data...