Lol what? He used sort which is a built in function, also his solution is O(nlogn) when the optimal solution is O(n)

so use the reduce is optimial because O(n) ?

nice try

This is O(n logn). The optimal is O(n).

OP solved it, closing

I basically created an extra variable for no reason. -______-
Great Job.

This is what I consider clever, not using the built in function.

same

Of course you can.

Didn't think of that. Good Point! Also like your solution using the spread operator.

Mutating the parameter ... ouch!

Closing this issue.

You should consider it.

So is it not adding/removing coins from its stock?

No problem!