it doesnt look approved

he pasted the link for another of his translations which has been approved, but he also made an unapproved translation for this kata

Approved some time ago

Added random tests, approve the fork, please.

Forked with random tests, reading the docs about XCTAssertEquals it only says expression1, expression2, is there a good practice about it? I've left it as Expected - Actual instead of Actual - Expected

if only to prevent people from whatabouting them when they publish their own kata without them

That's not really a valid reason.
I might even have approved it if there was a significant number of tests that don't print expected values in the end to make semi-automated hardcoding impractical... Although there's not much point to do that instead of random tests, but still...

Please provide random testing, even if the original doesn't.

Every kata should have random tests, if only to prevent people from whatabouting them when they publish their own kata without them. It's not that hard.

People like to see random tests these days. (Although I'm not really convinced they're absolutely necessary for a kata like this.)

Would anyone review a Swift translation of "Power of sets" ?
https://www.codewars.com/kumite/5b8e872236332f4ab900022f?sel=5b8e872236332f4ab900022f

Anyone?

Anyone? any feedback?
I'd love for someone to approve and merge this...

Hi everyone,
I've translated this kata to Swift and would love to get it approved :)
authors, power users - check it out ;-)

https://www.codewars.com/kumite/5b70a4721db5ce253b00009c?sel=5b70a4721db5ce253b00009c

it's been a few weeks since I posted it..

Thanks !

Hi everyone,
I've translated this kata to Swift and would love to get it approved :)
authors, power users - check it out ;-)

https://www.codewars.com/kumite/5b70a4721db5ce253b00009c?sel=5b70a4721db5ce253b00009c

it's been a few weeks since I posted it..

Thanks !

Will be glad to get some feedback.
Otherwise - will merge it tomorrow :)
Thanks!