fixed

I'm glad you liked it. thanks for the praise! cheers. DM

Properly suffered going through the OP's description. @zdreagin thanks for putting together the steps and proper description.

.

proud nerd

nerd

Hi, this kata hasn't got any preloaded code in no language. I don't get the point...

I appreciate the effort, but I'm not changing the description anymore. I do hope people who don't understand it find this though, and I sincerely hope it helps them.

Writing the description for this kata has been an exercise in frustration ( for everyone, not just me ) from the day it was published. I have no illusion any one description will suit all solvers and me ( I don't want to trivialise the kata by spelling out everything, which is the only way to satisfy some people, and anything else fits in some arbitrary position on a sliding scale. I'd like to let it rest. I'd have liked to put it to rest four years ago.

In what language? Both of them?

the "size" is commonly considered to be the dimension, hence exactly what you're suggesting. Are you sure it's not only a language issue?

Kata author is inactive; I've forked the kata to update the description here:

https://www.codewars.com/kumite/64ffa41a3ee3383073c42677

Would appreciate review.

This phenomena generalises over all integers, not just the naturals as expected by the test. If I were writing this from scratch I'd definitely extend it at least include zero, but I'm not and doing so would invalidate existing solutions.

Thank you!

Thanks, this table helped. :D

Thanks!