clearly didn't read the description

why same idea :P

Rust translation

Approved

good blesss.

Took me awhile to understand which method do we need to use for rounding numbers. For everyone wondering as I did:

1. When rounding general time (original time), it is needed to round up.
2. When rounding final time (new time you get), it is needed to round down.

I saw it now! thank you lots hobovsky :)

Your solution fails this example test:

assert.strictEqual(cookingTime("7500W", 0, 5, "600W"), "1 minutes 3 seconds");

Your solution returns 1'2", while correct answer is 1'3". In one place you handle rounding incorrectly, try to figure out where.

Prolog translation

Approved

python new test framework is required. updated in this fork

I prefer this one for readability, very understandable at first glance

@angelplusultra
Distinct() keeps the first instance of an element and discards the rest.

The reason we reverse is because we want to keep the last item, not the first. A requirement from the kata description: "keeping the last ( rightmost ) occurrence of each element"

So we reverse it, remove the duplicates, then reverse it again to get it back to the original order.

I think this Kata is fundamentally flawed for the following reasons:

• The premise - that cooking times are inversely proportional to power - neither a well understood rule, nor it is present in the description
• The use of plurals "1 seconds" is inconsistent with everyday use of England, and is also not clarified in the description

I would therefore propse that it be retired as having no value