removed

Thanks! I appreciate the compliment.

You're right, when your code is not ok, the log doesn't show.

What do you mean you can't use it?

41,42,43,44...

Changed tests to cover all the range between 0 and 99. Enabled Node v14 too.

+1 not clever and not best practice

https://www.grammarly.com/blog/dice-die/#:~:text=Die%20is%20the%20singular%20form,plural%20form%20would%20be%20dies.

This is an old kata and its design won't be changed but for very good and unquestionnable reasons, because it would invalidate all existing solutions. Moreover, your suggestion is questionable, and I don't know on which alleged standards of CW it is base on.

The function does not expect behaviour any different from the underlying operator.

What requirement did you have in mind?

That's because there's only 10 test cases so it's highly unlikely that your function will generate the same string twice.

instead of accumulating the letters into a you are taking the first character of a at every call, so it never grows beyond 2

Yea same, it doesnt look hard, but when u start solving, there are many cases where u need to add extra code.

What is the important knowledge? I think I have missed the point :)

For me, it's 6kyu