thank you sm!

Couldn't be any clearer :) I'll try that next time!!

Thanks for your contribution, but this Kata seems to be a duplicate of this one and will be deleted soon I guess.

Alright I understand! I can't seem to delete this Kata myself for the moment tho, I'll try later or let someone delete it manually :)

Thank you! :)

I guess it's in a way that it's more fun! (I hope so) And with different ways to process the data!

Thanks for your contribution once again! Random tests yet again haha

Thanks a whole lot for your help! I see you forked my code, I tried to accept it but it didn't fork your test case code... So I implemented it manually. Still very new to all of this haha, tell me if I should have done something differently! Thanks again cheers

Hi there, thanks for the link to this documentation! I have to admit that I didn't understand it all... (This is my first Kata!) Do you think you could check out my test case code and see if something is wrong? I can send it to you.

thanks for your contribution! I think it has to do with the random test cases... On it!

I meant in the fixed and random cases, in other terms in all of them haha :)

I guess y'all are right, as no numbers represent an empty array in this case. I'll get rid of it in the test case and in the random cases.

I don't think it is, as this Kata requests the return of all the dividers, the Kata you linked to only requires the total count of them

Indeed, thanks for your contribution!