Good question but terrible description aand broken sample test cases. Please fix them!

Those are two lists with 3 items, the structure is the same.

Not a kata issue, they have the same nested structure, not the same items: sameStructureAs.

Can you please edit the writing part? It is pretty ugly and confusing. It can be done better. :)

As a sugegstion you could preload the houses array so people don't need to copy paste it in the code

this blow my mind

Where does he ask that? He sets up a recursive relationship with a single integer input. Would you consider factorial(x) to be a map/filter/reduce kata?

Thanks for the feedback. They're pretty random now

Thanks! now the js test cases doesn't use assert.deepEqual instead they use assert.closeTo

The issue is not the possible use of map/filter/reduce functions, but the fact that the author is asking to write a for loop mapping/filtering/reducing something.

I understand that you could use map/filter/reduce, but I don't think that is the only, or even easiest way.

It seems a bit pedantic to be marking an issue, just because certain functions/tools could be used to solve it.

Random Test is Not random enough.

additionally, beyond that:

ReferenceError: assert is not defined
    at Context.<anonymous> (test.js:9:5)
    at processImmediate (internal/timers.js:461:21)