• Sign Up
    Time to claim your honor
  • Training
  • Practice
    Complete challenging Kata to earn honor and ranks. Re-train to hone technique
  • Freestyle Sparring
    Take turns remixing and refactoring others code through Kumite
  • Community
  • Leaderboards
    Achieve honor and move up the global leaderboards
  • Chat
    Join our Discord server and chat with your fellow code warriors
  • Discussions
    View our Github Discussions board to discuss general Codewars topics
  • About
  • Docs
    Learn about all of the different aspects of Codewars
  • Blog
    Read the latest news from Codewars and the community
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
Just4FunCoder Avatar
mender
Name:Unknown
Clan:Unknown
Member Since:Mar 2021
Last Seen:Jul 2025
Profiles:
Following:100
Followers:218
Allies:73
View Profile Badges
  • Stats
  • Kata
  • Collections
  • Kumite
  • Social
  • Discourse
  • Conversations (3649)
  • Replies
  • Authored
  • Needs Resolution
  • Custom User Avatar
    • Just4FunCoder
    • resolved a suggestion on "Dominant array elements" kata
    • 7 days ago

    Not a kata suggestion

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Just4FunCoder
    • resolved an issue on "Magic Three" kata
    • 10 days ago

    Ruby:

    You are allowed to use a number more than once

    (Actual & expected were flipped in the assertion, so your code actually failed to consider repeating elements)

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Just4FunCoder
    • commented on "Magic Three" kata
    • 10 days ago

    Added in Ruby

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Just4FunCoder
    • resolved an issue on "Magic Three" kata
    • 10 days ago

    Done in this fork

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Just4FunCoder
    • commented on "3 chars to build all natural numbers" javascript solution
    • 16 days ago

    Runs in Node v10.x ...for some reason

  • Custom User Avatar
    • YurichBRO
    • commented on "BF Busy Beavers: 12" bf solution
    • 16 days ago

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Just4FunCoder
    • resolved a suggestion on "Clean Nesting Tree" kata
    • 29 days ago
  • Custom User Avatar
    • Just4FunCoder
    • resolved an issue on "Triangle number check" kata
    • last month

    Fixed in this fork

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Just4FunCoder
    • resolved an issue on "Triangle number check" kata
    • last month

    Approved the fork above

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Just4FunCoder
    • resolved a suggestion on "Triangle number check" kata
    • last month

    Approved

  • Custom User Avatar
    • trashy_incel
    • commented on ""Triangle number check" Ruby Translation"
    • last month

    hey, thanks for the review, i modified the literals so that they are Integers; the random tests should now expect true ~50% of the time.


    this kata makes no sense for floating point numbers and the tedious input validation mentioned in the description is against the authoring guidelines, and will have to be removed from all languages at some point (plus the kata has already been translated to statically typed languages where this kind of input validation is impossible)

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Just4FunCoder
    • commented on ""Magic Three" Ruby Translation"
    • last month
    1. Enabled Ruby 3.0 + RSpec [1]

    2. Generate true cases more often

    3. Added an edge cases [2]

    4. Flipped actual & expected in the assertion [3]

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Just4FunCoder
    • commented on ""Triangle number check" Ruby Translation"
    • last month

    The n generated in random tests are always a float, so returning false will pass all random tests. (This is because 1e5 & 1e9 are treated as floats in Ruby)

    You can replace 1e5 with 10**5 to generate true cases sometimes. (False cases can be a mix of integers & float value, or purely integers, depends on you)

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Just4FunCoder
    • commented on ""Coding Meetup #4 - Higher-Order Functions Series - Find the first Python developer" Ruby Translation"
    • last month
    1. Enabled Ruby 3.0 + RSpec

    2. Refsol now recurses properly instead of calling user solution

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Just4FunCoder
    • commented on ""Coding Meetup #2 - Higher-Order Functions Series - Greet developers" Ruby Translation"
    • last month

    Enabled Ruby 3.0 + RSpec

  • Loading more items...
  • © 2025 Codewars
  • About
  • API
  • Blog
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Code of Conduct
  • Contact

Confirm

  • Cancel
  • Confirm

Collect: undefined

Loading collection data...