lol

Changed everything and then approved.

ingeniously simple is what I mean. It's hard to find solutions like this which avoid so much complexity in the code

• Fixed it message

• Even out the true & false cases

• used chai for assertions

Damn, this is beautifully simple

Approved by someone

Approved.

Removed TestFactory because it is too loud when tests are failing. Approved.

It's also got best practice votes so I interpret it as "a good combination of being maintainable and efficient but not something you would expect to see in production code."

Ali, the only notable aspect of this answer is it's verbosity. It's not clever...

check here please: https://docs.codewars.com/getting-started/solutions/#clever

Approved

Should return false with [3, 2, 5, 0, 5, 8, 2, 6] and [5, 8, 0, 6, 2, 3, 2, 5] ==> expected: <false> but was: <true>

i think your algorithm is not reliable: it treats 3 the same as "3", which goes against the description

Clever doesn't necessarily mean best practices. I once saw a solution that was worded in the longest way possible (like, absurdly long) and it got clever because most people got a laugh out of it, lol.

merge conflict