Okay, I can do that

Oh, okay. Im sorry! What should i do? Should I just remove it then?

Silly mistake in my solution, used in the tests.

Fixed now.

Ok, clearly an issue with the reference solution used in the tests.

I'll try to get it fixed today.

This happens with most numbers where the answer should be n+2, sometimes n+3

unpublished

Fixed, thanks! :)

The C++ update to C++ 20 is one very unlucky thing. It's been worked on and off a couple of times already, there's been a lot of effort put into it and a lot of preparation has been done, but currently it's on hold again :(

I am also waiting for it, but there's no ETA other than "not now".

OUPS!!!!!!!!! Just to stay tuned... Tell me that the C++ translation of one of those is somewhere... waiting ???

BTW (nothing related to ... but): saw a post in the codewars feed saying "C++ last versions coming soon" => Do you kno what they do mean by soon ?

There is even more.

You are 100% right. My bad, I don't code in PYTHON at all so didn't see that.

Should remove mine :-(

This has been done now. Thanks again

Improved the tests :3

I think that naming the thing represented here a "number system" (instead of "number base system") would be okay. Number systems can be irregular in many ways, for example roman numerals, or factoradic system. Not many of them end up in ambiguous representations, true. But I think that if you squint your eyes hard enough, the "numeric system", without "base", would still fit.

Examples: Python authoring guide, Authoring examples collection.