NVM I read wrong: The test is telling my code is failing because for {8,8} should give me -1 and it's giving me 1 (which is totally wrong)...

Sorry ^^;

Hi there, I am having doubts about Length 2 sized arrays.
When n=0, there is nothing at the left (because there is no -1 position), so the answer should be 1 if position 1 equals to 0.
When n=1, there is something at the left (position 0) and nothing to the right (last position), so the answer should be 0 if position 0 equals to 0.

So I don't understand why {8,8} should be 1! I mean, n is not being counted, but the numbers at the left and at the right of n, isn't it?
Am I misreading something or missing something?

Java:

• method name should be camelCase, not PascalCase

Refer here on how to enable backward compatability to not invalidate all solutions

Reraised as an issue :-)

great job !!

@Awesome A.D.: thanks for the tip about printing during the test phase...it's a good thing to know (which I did not). Big thumb's up!

python, maybe others: there should be a fixed test for 0

• done
• done for all languages

done

Awesome, works like a charm now, thanks!

Ruby:

• Tests need update to Ruby 3,
• The block with fixed tests seems to be not correct because it emits no assertions.

Tests still need to be updated to Ruby 3, but this specific issue is fixed.

Are you sure? This does not seem right. I created a solution which always returns "" and it passes 0 tests.

EDIT: I think I can see the issue.

@Ruby: The random tests in Ruby seem broken, expecting "" as result for all test, preventing from submitting the kata.

ouch , good job