Replaced with in initial solution, sample tests, and test cases

First off {1, 3, 2, 2, 2, 5} wouldn't be an issue however, none of the two's would be an error, but for
{1, 3, 2, 2, 2, 5} none of the 2's would be an error thus none of them should be removed. For this in example in particular 5 would be the error.

Included image of periodic table

Updated, is there away that you could have a different description for each language?

Approved

[updated above]

Removed cpp from all of them, now they should be language agnostic :)

What do you mean see all the examples? Like see the examples done by hand?

LGTM, Thanks!

This is some beautiful python code, lgtm!

First you can have errors anywhere in the solar system. For an ordered solar system errors that occur before the first non errored planet are going to be larger, and errors after the first non errored planet are going to be less than. So for your example lets say we have
[sun, 10, 7, 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 20, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]

1. [10, 7, 5,] are all errors because they are all "greater than all non errors from 1 to numErrors * 2 + 1"
2. 20 would not happen in the problem generation, because "Errors after the first non errored planet will be too small" so you don't need to worry about it. However, in my opinion 20 would be an error.

I did update the question to clarify the second point here, hopefully this helps.

Add the two following test cases (unless I missed them):

• All planets in a solar system are larger than max size (user returns empty string)
• All planets have at least 1 of the required elements missing (user returns empty string)

I am not super good at python, but everything else good!

I increased the number of tests on the wrong one, I wanted to increase the number of tests on tiny solar systems, because if someone were to fail it would be easier to debug.

stated that it is an inclusive maximum size, and that only elements from 1 - 118 are used without repeating.

Yes,

Fixed