Ad
  • Default User Avatar

    Very beatiful and nice kata

  • Custom User Avatar

    Replaced with in initial solution, sample tests, and test cases

  • Custom User Avatar

    In C++:

    • #include <iostream> is unnecessary in initial solution and in sample tests
    • #include <string> is missing in initial soltuion
  • Custom User Avatar

    First off {1, 3, 2, 2, 2, 5} wouldn't be an issue however, none of the two's would be an error, but for
    {1, 3, 2, 2, 2, 5} none of the 2's would be an error thus none of them should be removed. For this in example in particular 5 would be the error.

  • Custom User Avatar

    Trying C++...
    Could you precise the "4- If planets in a row are the same size it will not count as an error for ordered nor antiordered"
    Doest it mean that you remove ALL the same values in a row (i.e. {1,3,2,2,2,5} becomes {1,3,5} for ordered, having no error), or does it mean that you keep only the 1rst anomaly meaning 1,3,2,2,2,5 yields to {1,3,2,5} and thus leaves with 1 error ?
    Should it be "4- If planets in a row are the same size it will not count as multiple errors for ordered nor antiordered" ?

  • Custom User Avatar

    Included image of periodic table

  • Custom User Avatar

    Approved by author

  • Custom User Avatar
  • Custom User Avatar

    People need to lookup the periodic table to know what to expect in a solar system. You should specify elements are titlecased. This way, the kata can be solved without having to click an external link.

  • Custom User Avatar

    That one can only be applied by usage of language code-blocks, but should not be encouraged except for tutorial-based katas that require emphasizing syntax-wise differences among languages during implementation.

  • Custom User Avatar

    Updated, is there away that you could have a different description for each language?

  • Custom User Avatar

    Since python's function name (and other languages that uses snake_case) will be incompatible with the current description despite update below, a more generalized form is suggested like

    **Input 1, Input2 --> Output**
    ["OHNCCaP_100", "OHC_200", "OCa_50", "OHCCaP_400", "OHNCCaP_225", "OHCa_250"], 250 --> "OHNCCaP_225"
    

    Above is just an example, as long as you remove the function name across all sections of your description, it should be fine.

  • Custom User Avatar

    Approved

  • Custom User Avatar

    [updated above]

  • Custom User Avatar

    Removed cpp from all of them, now they should be language agnostic :)

  • Loading more items...