Marking issue as resolved following the addition of the RandomMagnaCartaTests test class, containing three methods.

Marking suggestion as resolved following the addition of the FirstCharacterAndAmpersand() test methd.

Great spot, thank you! I have added Michalis to the description and updated the solution & Clause_FiftyFour().

As illustrated here & is a ligature of E and t, rather than e and t. Therefore, I believe it is appropriate to replace occurences of Et and et.

The String object is immutable. Every time you use one of the methods in the System.String class, you create a new string object in memory, which requires a new allocation of space for that new object. In situations where you need to perform repeated modifications to a string, the overhead associated with creating a new String object can be costly. The System.Text.StringBuilder class can be used when you want to modify a string without creating a new object. For example, using the StringBuilder class can boost performance when concatenating many strings together in a loop.

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-gb/dotnet/standard/base-types/stringbuilder

hobovsky, try again. 😎

you should have 100

Each random test is enclosed in a for loop that runs 100 times.

random tests should optimally cover all types of tests including edge cases...

I see what you mean, but my fixed tests already cover the introduction and all of the clauses of the document in question. The random tests are a good addition because they ensure that a solution cannot be hardcoded.

Hacky is fine. I've added a couple of randoms that variably test strings with ampersands. What do you think?

I've added two randoms. What do you think?

@hobovsky, these all look like fun challenges, I'll have to try them. They also look quite different to my kata. Although there is some overlapping logic that is required to solve my kata and the ones you've listed, on the whole my kata is distinct.

@dfhwze, Triangular Treasure and Function 2 - squaring an argument only deal with one type of polygonal number. They are to my kata what an addition (only) kata or a division (only) kata is to a calculator kata. I don't understand the Nth Order Summation kata, but I can see that our katas are nothing alike. The solutions are not at all similar, proving how different the challenges are.

I searched before coding, and I believe my challenge is unique. Which katas are you referring to?