Adjusted, thanks!

Same of the previous comment:

User answered with 2000

Right answer: 1

System says: "2000 should equal 1"

If I invert the order result in a wrong answer:

1 should equal 2000. No, should equal 1.

I think I did not understand the problem.

You have 90K (kyu). I think you have the privilege to edit the kata. If you do this, please explain your change.

Or please help me to understand better.

Thanks

Adjusted. Seems ok in the tests, but I did the same changes in the example tests and the changes was not exhibited in the example tests :(

About the order, please see the message returned:

"20000 should equal 1"

I forced the function in my solution testing the kata (I am changing the user solution, not the kata) to return 2000. In this case the message returned looks like ok, right?

Message returned: "20000 should equal 1"

2000 -> what user returned
should equal 1 (1 is the right answer).

Ok, right?

this link is locked to me

thanks, I will try to adjust when I arrive home

thanks, I will try to adjust when I arrive home

Adjusted, I understood, I think. User solution is the problem

Actual answer: "2 should equal 3".

User response is 2. The software was expecting 3. Is not clear?

Yes, we have random tests. Please verify again.

Adjusted. Ok?

You are right, thanks. I added some break lines for the text be easier to read. I forgot initially that I have privilege to do that kkk

I am impressed with how the informations are bad organized. What are the name of the tables as example? Why blank lines are not inserted to make the text more clear?

I only saw a similar Kata, not a exactly equals kata

The test returned me that in Javascript I used the character "r". But I only used ASCII codes