If the len(r)%3 == 0 then why you should add 30 more minutes ? The job is basically done. No rest need.

approved

Julia translation

I published a correct one yet ;)

I don't claim to be able to read COBOL, but if the original translation was OK then the fixed one looks OK.

Cheers!

Your Haskell solution was invalidated BTW. :P

Fixed there in COBOL, please check and approve.

Tests with negative numbers have been removed from Python and Ruby.

Please see Issue in ( current ) top post.

Haskell fixed.

COBOL seems to have an incorrect example solution.

C# fixed.

JS fixed and updated to Node 12.x.

Python fixed and test(-1) removed.

Ruby fixed and test(-1) removed.

.. up to, but not including, the maximum value.

Fixed tests where max is in the Fibonacci sequence are necessary to weed out solutions that wrongly use <= instead of <.

Pointless suggestion

^ 100% this.

language: python

Why the use of any of them should make a solution invalid? This only concerns one language, please be explicit about that. Pointless suggestion, IMO.

approved