If this is a joke it's a really clever one

i am sorry if i heart anyone's feelings. that person really did a hard job, maybe because he don't know some packages. but that's why practice makes perfect.

Instead of criticising someone's work, how about suggesting alternatives?

If I am coding for me its ok to avoid most of the data validation.
I hope most of the members hear for improving the skills and adapt new ideas to be a bug free coding.
When practicing do concentrate in perfection, it’s my vision.

I am sorry to both of you if I heart you in some way.

Just my opinion, but it seems the whole point is to write code for the purpose of passing the tests, so if it passes; it passes. I actually often don't read the description, if it's not necassary. First thing I do is return the inputs to see what I'm given, and what is expected. THEN, I read the description if it's not obvious what to do. This saves me a lot of time. If any requirement is truly a requirement, it should be tested for.
That being said, I do appreciate the hard work of the kata creators, and some descriptions are very clever/funny and have made me laugh out loud at times.

You can't expect the Users to read the description

Why iterate the list?

Did a lot of effort for creating the dict

good one, at least no one can reverse engineer you code

At last Done, Every function and operations have a basic method and it is using minimum processor resources.

Time: 11877msExit Code: 137
Response received but no data was written to STDOUT or STDERR.

hope its the same time out