Instead of criticising someone's work, how about suggesting alternatives?

Just my opinion, but it seems the whole point is to write code for the purpose of passing the tests, so if it passes; it passes. I actually often don't read the description, if it's not necassary. First thing I do is return the inputs to see what I'm given, and what is expected. THEN, I read the description if it's not obvious what to do. This saves me a lot of time. If any requirement is truly a requirement, it should be tested for.
That being said, I do appreciate the hard work of the kata creators, and some descriptions are very clever/funny and have made me laugh out loud at times.

You can't expect the Users to read the description

That doesn't work, try another way. The kata works, I just passed with the same algorithm I used in javascript.

It was in Python, right? Remember mentioning the language. That's a problem with your code, not a kata issue.

Infinite sequences are tested in Python.

Check the posts below, maybe that'll point you in the right path.

That's a problem with your code, not a kata issue.

I think it's about this:

In this Kata, a string is said to be in ALL CAPS whenever it does not contain any lowercase letter so any string containing no letters at all is trivially considered to be in ALL CAPS.

I'm not sure what you mean, would you mind elaborating? E.g. what is the exact input where the tests expect True but you think should be False?