I meant no attack on you personally, Azuaron (or the other warriors who completed with this code). I applaude your ability to write something in a consise mannor that solves the problem. However, I do not believe this solution best represents the term "Best Practice". It is clever, but a solution that I would consider "Best Practice" would also clearly convey the intent of what the code is accomplishing.

Emotion is hard to convey over text, and I assure you that my words in the previous post carried no malice with them. Thank you for your reply, and in future posts I will be sure to convey my opinions more clearly.

Not best practice. Imagine trying to read this function with no context of the problem it was trying to solve. What does p stand for? How how about aug? Consider changing the argument names at least to something more readable.

I would also agree with @weejo on the argument mutation problem of this solution.

The Ruby version needs updating. It gives code as a starting point, and gives away another solution in the test file.

@JavierHeisecke my pleasure! And @Chrono79 I will keep that in mind, thank you. What is the edicate here on spoilers, then?