Fixed in fork and approved

What's wrong with comments?

Reraised above with more info

Thank you ;)

That looks reasonable. I would have used random lengths as well, but that's not that important.

Added random tests for both JS and Python version.
Can you check if this meets what you asked for?

XD

Stay safe

He may even be defending the Capitol right now.

Let's not do anything rash.

Okay

JS is no worse than Python functionally. The tests are not written very maintainably, but you can always ask for a translation fork.

Removing it would be a little on the heavy handed side I think.

Note that the translation author has not reacted yet. He might just be asleep, away or busy. It's only been half a day.

I think I will be removing this translation.
I am not very familiar with js, so I guess it's better to wait for a better one.

• "should work" is kinda poor title for a test case :)
• potential edge cases missing in Python and JS: uncensor('', '') and uncensor('***', 'abc')

Writing documentation is no strong point of mine, and ATM no priority of mine either.

@Johan, not actually:

But I believe you would love to contribute on that:
https://github.com/codewars/docs/issues/214

Does that document exist for JS yet? Because that's what we're talking about here.