the changes from indexing won't work as its a parameter

Why do you say that?

You can avoid this now with the walrus operator

Looks good to me. However, I tried to approve and got Failed to approve: translation must be pending over a week or the kata author must be inactive for the past month

While we're changing things, how about the parameter names? list_of_art is especially mysterious, with nothing in the problem that seems to fit the "art" abbreviation

Sometimes the best problems are slightly annoying, in a way that requires you to think about them. This is a good example of that.

I was thrown off when using words as a name and accidentally shadowing the global. Not a huge deal, but I would prefer the global to be all caps, or passed in explicitly.

reduce with lambda: ehh.
reduce without lambda: beautiful.

Sample tests (in Python) are too easy, delaying all the good stuff for the real tests. We could use one that sets the same attribute twice, for example.

Good kata for trying again in different ways, with different approaches

I think most people will assume that the operations "consume" their inputs, and they would be right. But yeah, the description should state it anyway, just to be clear.

Some solutions mutate position and while that doesn't break the meaning or the tests, it does feel "wrong."

Okay, it is pretty clear in the examples. I admit I skimmed over them. But a tiny line could be added to the description when it's talking about precedence for other things.