In this case, it won't. Since the inputs are within a limited range! Another case for large inputs tho

Already mentioned in description

fixed

Indeed :)
And I would even add:
stage 10 "Jeez! It was actually SO obvious after all!.. How could I not see it at first? :/"
I had initially gone on a much more "far-fetched" path / more "complex" behaviour^^

that was a fun challange thanks :D

@GiacomoSorbi thank you for fixing it have been eagerly trying to test my solution :P

(spoiler alert) it timed out what a suprise... Though it wasn't hard to fix.
Sometimes I'm a bit to naive with solutions honesly oh well.

Hi Voile,

It seems you totally messed up the python version... x) please correct it (see above)

hi,

Your c++ translation has troubles in the random tests (see above). You should check the crystal one too, so.

cheers

issue confirmed in c++:

scramble("tjuofkoiyufmdgfhn", "fodjhfuyuf");

expects false while it should be true

Nope no timeout errors or any other critical error, just the

Expected: false
Actual: 1

my time before it stops is well within the time out region 2738ms so that should be fine.

My bad then. You're right. If those are the test values, it should indeed expect true.
What's the error message you get? I've tried a not efficient enough code and it shows a log of a list of tests where the last one should return true, but the error below shows this:

Expected: false
Actual: 1
 STDERR
Execution Timed Out (12000 ms)

So the message is confusing, the real error there is the timeout.

The first string has 2u's and the secons string aks for 2 u's?
tjUofkoiyUfmdgfhn -> fodjhfUyUf

Not an issue. Not enough u in the first string.