No, if someone's raising an issue they need to prove their case. The issue as it currently stands is not actionable anyway (what are we supposed to do with the information? "Test case is wrong" means nothing if the reason is not explained), so resolving it is perfectly fine.

@Blind4Basics
Your reply isn't very helpful. You need to prove your case.

wrong, tests cases are correct.

There's no way to reliably check for them without either some false negatives or some false positives, so we live with the latter.

Which is... not much of a problem anyway, you can always rename your variable to something which does not trigger the code content tests.

Me too...

Python tests fixed, description updated -- see the kata editor for comments. Use the same method for other languages.

Cheers

I might help you.
How can I write to you? email or something like that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_congruential_generator

Thank you for response. I've disabled shuffle, shuffle!, select, sample. Can you describe another ways to cheat?

The description says:

... h, mn, s is the time needed in hours, minutes and seconds (don't worry for fractions of second)

So ints are expected for the results (as you can also see with the examples and examples tests).

You need to check that the array item is non boolean (by using the 'is' comparator).