Loading collection data...
Collections are a way for you to organize kata so that you can create your own training routines. Every collection you create is public and automatically sharable with other warriors. After you have added a few kata to a collection you and others can train on the kata contained within the collection.
Get started now by creating a new collection.
Superceded by above
What does your solution return for
up_array([])
? It should returnNone
.It seems you are testing the current top voted solution - are you running it with some of the #commented_out tests?
There is one test:
test.assert_equals(up_array([3.14, 1.41, 2.72]), None);
that will cause a ValueError, but this test is commented-out in the test suite so should not run when you press Attempt (unless you deleted the # comment part) - maybe you un-commented it?
I am sorry but I do not understand exactly what's the problem. Does you solution not work? Or maybe some solution from "Solutions" page does not work? Which one?
Added
It seems that somebody has deleted almost all description code blocks except C++ and Python.
So if it was a mistake then it should be coppied from the Kata languages.
There are still description conflicts that should be resolved and probably this is the reason you could not approve the previous forks...
Okay I mad now a other one
Possibli it dosent work becaus this:
I copied it now again but didn't add this one:
okay better?
I think I fixed it now. I extendet it but I have no Preload so I wrote
Python has no Preloaded
Oh, nice, that gives it some more room to breathe.
Any other points? Or is it ready for approval?
This happens when more than one translations created at the same time.
So when the first author added the description and published.
Then the second is not able to publish because there are description conflicts that need to be resolved. In this case the author should
fork
the translation andedit
the description and only then publish!But in your case if you work on Kata directly... You just need to edit the description, i.e. remove those
<<<<<<
headers and leave the actual text!@sanshironagato what problem with description? I do not see any...
I've just added
C and NASM blocks
to refrect its pecurialities!Yes I also fixed it now it is the last one
Loading more items...