Is this scientifically accurate? Doesn't it go 2, 8, 8, 18, 32, 8, 2, etc?

but what if you created a timeit function that tested if you were able to optimize the original counter function and make a faster way? 8)

Change N_blue to b or something easier to type out.

pretty much stolen but it was good to know, i tried beautifulsoup but im just dumb so yeah sorry to whoever i copied if they didn't want to be copied i guess i learned a bit

yeah... i thought it was harder than it actually was

will change to 5 even though retired

add more tests and random tests

but if he made a python translation it would obv have an anticheat blocking counter

only one of the test cases needs a value of true, and it's literally the example test case, too. very easy to hardcode. add the big rando test

For Python, I try my tests here and it doesn't work, then I try my tests in a python-running software and it shows my solution here is correct. (Probably because jhoffner used 2.7.6. Update maybe?)

Sorry. I forfeited eligibility and looked at the solutions. I see, issue removed.

Unpublished.

Ok.

I haven't seen any kata that require every character to be changed, but I get your point of its similarity. I didn't really think about that when I made this kata, considering I thought that the main part of the kata was the "upside-down" part and using external sources. (oops i guess, don't really know what else I can say to that)

I moved the preloaded function to the test cases. By adding the function, I think that the random tests now generate one dollar; I think it's fixed.