Loading collection data...
Collections are a way for you to organize kata so that you can create your own training routines. Every collection you create is public and automatically sharable with other warriors. After you have added a few kata to a collection you and others can train on the kata contained within the collection.
Get started now by creating a new collection.
see here
ranks wont be changed 🤷
Much more than size 50 !! I test with size 5 - 80. When size are more than 70, all (x,y) work in almost 1 minute... I just say 5 to 50, your code run with all (x,y) in less than 5 minutes, and some program who use backtracking can't solve only one case, for example, size = 7, x = 0, y=1, in these 5 minutes...
Size = 5, seem minimum, I think it's because knight's move are 'long' and a little bit strange, in "L"...
When you talk about heuristic, are min/max algorithms, are an heuristic method ?
If you are so good in playing chess that you are in coding, it's better I never play against you in chess game ( I'm a very little beginner for this fabulous gama)
Regards
Bruno
Thanks! I glad you like this solution!
It is using "Intelligence" (an Heuristic) vs "Brute Force" (Backtracking)
It is nice to know that the algoritm also work fine with nxn form 5.. to 50!! Thats is really crazy and with a runtime of less than 5 min... that blob my mind! :)
Thanks for the fedback an the extra info!
I hope more chess and coders enthusisats will enjoy it!
Regards!
Pablo
Congratulation !!! Very good job, I try your code, the fastest code I see here : size from 5 to 50, x from 0 to size, y from 0 to size ( each value test for all, with 3 for loop ... 100 % good result, in less than 5 minutes !!!! I 'll studie your code, because mine, is very long, rought draft and don't send always 100 % good result ^^
There's no difference.
Already raised as an issue.
No clue what you wrote, I didn't read it
Thanks! Sorry for the issues...
yep, seems all good.
Approved again ;-)
I've approved the new kumite twice, is that a fix of the issue above?
Fixed Three Issues:
Fixed the issue:
I have put the validator class in a private inner class in the test case class.
I delete the validator from the preloaded part
Hi pablo,
Could you take a look at my messages above and address the different issues, please?
Cheers,
B4B
Loading more items...