I would ask you to please mind your language on the site. Also constructive feedback goes a long way further than just insults.

The shittiest Kata I've ever seen...

On input "from(...args)" I removed "name" index to be able to pass the tests.

from(...args){
if(args.length == 1){
args[0].slice("name");

There used to be a bug that when forking, you didn't always fork of the latest version. Perhaps that occured again here ..

thank you :)

no idea how it regressed either :(

Fixed again here - please ( review and ) approve.

I don't really understand how it's possible it broke. @dfhwze forked the kata a week ago, but that should have forked the fixed version. ( Eight years ago forking was not available - I probably just edited the kata directly, so there should be no wrong version to fork. )

Resolved merge conflicts in description. I hope no earlier description updates got reverted. If so, let me know.

it's still happening, could you please fix it if you have editing / mender rights ? also, chai.config.truncateThreshold= 0 is desperately needed ^^

The timeout issues you've experienced are because your algorithm is slow (most solutions finish in <= 1sec), otherwise yes I agree that the description could be more explicit about the desired shape of the cartesian products.

Make a Python version, begging u :(

Hint: dont waste your time on it

how stupid is this logic.
after 2 undo and 2 redo x should equal 50.
why it is not like this?

joins are poorly described in the spec, both in that the from clause allows for multiple arrays as well as explaning how that data should get merged together. This is particularly noticable imo because the details indicate that it's heavily influenced by SQL syntax and behavior but how do you join tables with only from and where (no explicit joins). Additionally, there are so many tests it's not uncommon for the server to timeout when executing an attempt that I had to sit around for 30 minutes waiting to get my submission accepted

cool