Already banned for repeated cheating. Offensive comments are currently being removed.

Fixed

By answering to a similar issue I noticed that your dropS and splitAtS functions can't handle negative values. This is most likely the issue. Sadly I can't test for it and I am terribly sorry that a few people had a bad experience for that reason (I added a hint in the description now).

Mh, seems still open here; care to check again?

If this issue is solved, I would say we could approve the kata :)

Thanks for the feedback! I'm on it, this is my first crack at creating a kata.

Great suggestion. Updated. Thanks!

Great points, I'll get on it

Starting code still seems to provide _.min for the third function.

Thanks! Got it fixed.

10%1 == 0; //1
9%1 == 0; //2
8%1 == 0; //3
7%1 == 0; //4
6%1 == 0; //5
5%1 == 0; //6
4%1 == 0; //7
3%1 == 0; //8
2%1 == 0; //9
1%1 == 0; //10
0%1 == 0; //11
The test is correct. I don't see your issue. How can it possibly be 12?

Thanks for the feed, surtich: it was my goal to have coders think about it in a not so straightforward manner (I can think of at least a couple of quick ways to brute force such a problem, but I fear both would not work in the allotted time).

I like to think that while this kata is hard, it is also doable by almost any coder, as it requires no advanced knowledge of some unknown algo or some exoteric trick: you just sit down, look at your numbers and try to figure out how they work :)