Approved!

Your reference solution does not make assumptions about the size of the inner arrays, yet all the tests exclusively use size 3 (and, more generally, assume all the inner arrays have the same size). Are there assumptions about the structure of the arrays? That should be explicitly stated, and if the answer is no, then the fixed tests should be varied up to avoid giving that idea. Ambiguities like this force the translators to make design decisions that they shouldn't have to make (ex: use a tuple? variable length array? hardcode size in random tests? ...?).

Haskell fork

Adding random tests.

Haskell fork

• Added random tests

Haskell translation

In the process of translating, I noticed the outstanding issues and decided to give the decription a serious overhaul by almost entirely rewriting it.

• Language-specific terminology has been replaced with language-agnostic terms.
• The requirements for the returned subsequences have been formalized in the description outside of the examples.
• Clarification has been added regarding the ordering of the returned subsequences.

Thanks!

Haskell translation

Haskell fork

The random input generation has been limited to printable ASCII characters to avoid confusion (this is a white kata, after all!), addressing these issues.

Haskell translation

Haskell translation

Haskell translation

Haskell translation

Haskell translation

Haskell translation

Haskell translation