Thank you! There are many people with access to editing the text, and sometimes people just change it without me even knowing...
Fixed it.

I'm afraid this time my fault is different.

The drive time to montpellier was 9.5 and 10.5 in the starter code but not in my solution. I forgot to update it earlier (which was another issue) but as I went over the kata again to fix the issue you've raised before I've found it and updated it as well to 9 and 11.

That half an hour accounts for both errors.

I am terribly sorry for this and again thank you for your feedback.
I can only hope that someone who has created so many katas himself can forgive my noob problems. I'm trying to create some standard process for myslef to create a kata that'll be worth people's while with as few hiccups as possible, but I'm still learning a lot so obviously I'm missing some things here...

The problem was with my code. I have built a way-too-complicated solution that did not account for the minutes, instead used Date.getHours() to set new times. Not a good idea. I've changed my solution altogether, and now it should consider every single minute (but not seconds).
I've also changed the difficulty to be a 6 kyu. I'm not entirely sure about it, so if I'm wrong feel free to change it.

Thanks again for your feedback! :)

I have to create a special 'sad LOL' icon for this one... o.O

As for the first case I don't know what happened, but when I copy pasted your times and used it on my solution I got 'between Montpellier and Nice' as well.
Any idea what could have happened there? You know the system better than I do...

As for the second case - You are totally correct. It should be exactly as you've described. I'll have to figure out my error... In the meanwhile I'll unpublish the kata.

Right, thanks! :)

Fixed.

Wow. OK.

I've learned a lot from your feedback and will implement it in the next kata.

This one will be unpublished immediately.

Thanks.

That is an awesome solution! :)
Is it ok if I use it for the original kata (with credit of course) to check if it solves the randomized testing performance issue?

Hi everyone. :)

I wrote this simple loop practice kata, but I'm having some problems with the randomized tests.
It seems like any array I pass as a parameter that is longer than 1 (stopsArray=[1]) breaks the tests as a performance issue.

I've checked a few possibilities and got down to hardcoding a 100 item array (instead of loop-pushing it) in an attempt to improve performance, but the second I change the array for the randomized tests from [1] to [1, 2] it breaks...

Any ideas why it happens and how to fix it?

Other than that any feedback will be welcomed, of course.

Thanks in advance and I hope you enjoy this simple kata.

Can you describe your logic? Maybe we can help you debug, if it won't be a spoiler...

Oh, then I misunderstood your intention before. My apologies.

Yes, I agree that it could have been much more complicated, but I made this kata which is actually an interesting challenge, I think, but no one seems to solve it and I believe it's because of the very long instructions. That's why I tried to keep this one short, in order to make sure it's less intimidating.

Again - thank you. :)

I thought he meant the first written tests, not the example tests.
I have changed them to cover a few specific sets after his feedback, instead of sort of randomly going through cases, as was before.
I didn't change the example tests, as they are a part of the instructions like any other kata's example test.

You are right and that was the point of the kata.
The idea was to get the person solving it read the completely unreasonalbe and unrelated instructions and make a judgement call to implement a much better and simpler solution than the client requirements.

As I wrote below in response to someone else, I understood it was not a good kata and have unpublished it, but if you still saw it perhaps unpublishing does not mean what I thought it did. I'll look into it.
Anyway I want to cancel this kata.

Thanks for your input. :)

@Johan - thank you for this comment.

Considering the overall ratings of 50% (which, if I understand correctly, means people were indifferent to it, right?) I have decided to unpublish it.

I've got some more ideas, I'll work on them. All in all, that's how I'll learn, right? :)

BTW - If you'll get a chance, I'd love to get your feedback on this kata (if it's ok to ask...?) -
https://www.codewars.com/kata/5c45e3b0a4db1e0922ddcad0

I take it this kata really annoyed you.
Well, I think I understand what you mean and I'll fix it immediately.

Wow... Well, that's not exactly constructive criticism but i'll try to learn from it too.
Thanks for your feedback. If in the future you'll feel like being a bit more constructive I'll appreciate that as well.