The directions are a bit sparse. I think using the word "rank" to signify both the letter_value and the position in sorted winning_numbers could be confusing.

I think you have just the right idea. This is a great learning tool. I think I would like to make something like this for Redux.

The difficulty here is that a person needs to already have some sense of how Flux works in order to understand what to do. Maybe a bit more background on stores?

agreed

Dilute. B4B, the word you're looking for is 'dilute.' Yes, it makes perfect sense that CW should prvent the dilution of the platform--though, how that plays out should be up for debate. Certainly, the platform should accomodate interesting stories that frame a given challenge within a word-problem, because it reifies the theoretical framework in a useful way--at least, useful for learning.

I added fixed tests that accomodate additional edge cases. But, there is no need to explicitly state all of the edge-case requirements in the descrption.

I think it may be likely that your (both of you) first languages are not English, but that is no excuse for sounding like tools.

Thanks for the advice. I will keep it for my own use in a tutoring setting.

Get over yourselves. It's for kids.

1. In order to facilitate discovery learning, I have not expliticly stated the final condidtions.
2. This is a simple enough concept, it doesn't really require exhaustive tests.

Certainly. Several other submitted solutions accomplish this. To be honest, my solution was in protest of the task. Obviously, a loadbalancer need not assign jobs according to their numberical value, which is to say, the status of the 'solution' after the second loop should be acceptable.

You're absolutely right. Thank you.

1. I removed the outer list for these tests. Uncaught copy/paste error.
2. That is on purpose. In a chess game, it is certainly possible for a piece to later move to the "start" spot vacated by the knight.
3. Random tests added.

It's not obvious why every answer should have two indicies. For example, it seems counter-intuitive that reverseFizzBuzz([1,"Fizz","Buzz","Fizz",5,"FizzBuzz"]) ==> [2,3] while reverseFizzBuzz(["Fizz","Fizz","Fizz","Fizz","Fizz","FizzBuzz"]) ==> [1,6]. In the second case, 6 is a multiple of 1...

Do you know how to generate random tests in Ruby?

Will you rate my new kata "Knight's Attack"? No one has tried it yet.

Thanks, man. It means a lot coming from you. It's my first one.